IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/ipppap/halshs-02537482.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Analyzing Socio-Fiscal Policies through the Lens of Gender Inequality

Author

Listed:
  • Antoine Bozio

    (PSE - Paris School of Economics - UP1 - Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne - ENS-PSL - École normale supérieure - Paris - PSL - Université Paris Sciences et Lettres - EHESS - École des hautes études en sciences sociales - ENPC - École des Ponts ParisTech - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - INRAE - Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement, PSE - Paris-Jourdan Sciences Economiques - ENS-PSL - École normale supérieure - Paris - PSL - Université Paris Sciences et Lettres - INRA - Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique - EHESS - École des hautes études en sciences sociales - ENPC - École des Ponts ParisTech - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, IPP - Institut des politiques publiques)

  • Sophie Cottet

    (IPP - Institut des politiques publiques)

  • Marion Monnet

    (IPP - Institut des politiques publiques)

  • Lucile Romanello

    (IPP - Institut des politiques publiques)

Abstract

The tax and benefit system probably affects men and women differently because of the differences in living situations and behaviours that mean that men and women do not enjoy the same tax arrangements, and do not necessarily respond in the same way to changes in public policy. However, identifying the effects of a change to our tax and benefit system on the inequalities between men and women is a relatively complicated process: because men and women live and interact in the same collective fiscal entities (family or other household units), resources are often pooled, even if only partially. In order to measure the effects on an individual level of a change to the tax and benefit system, we must first investigate how resources are allocated and the tax burden is shared among the individuals of the household receiving said benefits or liable for those tax payments. We propose a methodology based on four different rules of distribution, which gives us intervals for the effect of a budgetary measure on women on the one hand, and for men on the other. Applied to the income tax reform of 2015, we find that this policy would have resulted in higher average gains for men, of between 1.20 and 8.10 euros per year. • A gender analysis is obligatory today for any new bill, but putting it into practice in the case of bills in the area of public finance remains unsatisfactory. • Identifying the individual effect of socio-fiscal reform requires an understanding of how income, particularly taxes and benefits, is shared among members of a family or other fiscal unit. At present, there are few studies that show such distribution in detail. • A multi-method approach, using different hypotheses about income distribution within collectivities and comparing their results, gives us a value interval in which the real effect of a budgetary measure on subgroups can be found. • We observe that, regardless of the hypothesis used about the pooling of resources within the fiscal household, the gains associated with the 2015 income tax reform are slightly higher for men.

Suggested Citation

  • Antoine Bozio & Sophie Cottet & Marion Monnet & Lucile Romanello, 2016. "Analyzing Socio-Fiscal Policies through the Lens of Gender Inequality," Institut des Politiques Publiques halshs-02537482, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:ipppap:halshs-02537482
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-02537482
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-02537482/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:ipppap:halshs-02537482. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Caroline Bauer (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.