IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/cesptp/hal-01396350.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Spread of Rational Choice in the Social Sciences: A Sign of Strength or Weakness?
[L’expansion du choix rationnel en sciences sociales : signe de vigueur ou marque de faiblesse ?]

Author

Listed:
  • Camille Chaserant

    (CES - Centre d'économie de la Sorbonne - UP1 - Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

  • Victoire Girard

    (LEO - Laboratoire d'Économie d'Orleans [UMR7322] - UO - Université d'Orléans - UT - Université de Tours - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

  • Antoine Pietri

    (CES - Centre d'économie de la Sorbonne - UP1 - Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

Abstract

The Handbook of Rational Choice Social Research provides an overview of the rational choice paradigm's achievements. This review article shows how the rational choice approach has gradually become a paradigm by overcoming sociology's traditional divisions in three ways. Firstly, assumptions about the actor's decision-making environment have been significantly refined to provide a better understanding of the influence of social structure on individual choices. At the same time, the rationality assumption has been greatly relaxed in order to integrate some of the many experimental results that have shown homo oeconomicus to be empirically inadequate. Thirdly, increasing the complexity of both the environment and decision-making processes has stimulated the study of a broad range of topics that were previously not much explored by the rational choice approach – we discuss the analysis of violence – establishing, according to some authors, new relationships between the various disciplines in the social field.

Suggested Citation

  • Camille Chaserant & Victoire Girard & Antoine Pietri, 2016. "The Spread of Rational Choice in the Social Sciences: A Sign of Strength or Weakness? [L’expansion du choix rationnel en sciences sociales : signe de vigueur ou marque de faiblesse ?]," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) hal-01396350, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:cesptp:hal-01396350
    DOI: 10.3917/rfs.571.0131
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Other versions of this item:

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:cesptp:hal-01396350. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.