IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/gtr/gatrjs/jfbr220.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Optimizing Cryptocurrency Portfolios: A Comparative Study of Rebalancing Strategies

Author

Listed:
  • Nichanan Sakolvieng

    (Martin de Tours School of Management and Economics, Assumption University, Thailand. Author-2-Name: Sutta Sornmayura Author-2-Workplace-Name: Martin de Tours School of Management and Economics, Assumption University, Thailand. Author-3-Name: Kaimook Numgaroonaroonroj Author-3-Workplace-Name: Martin de Tours School of Management and Economics, Assumption University, Thailand. Author-4-Name: Author-4-Workplace-Name: Author-5-Name: Author-5-Workplace-Name: Author-6-Name: Author-6-Workplace-Name: Author-7-Name: Author-7-Workplace-Name: Author-8-Name: Author-8-Workplace-Name:)

Abstract

" Objective - This study aims to contribute to the field of cryptocurrency portfolio management and rebalancing strategies by empirically investigating the impact of different allocation frequencies and threshold percentages on the risk-adjusted returns of cryptocurrency portfolios. Methodology/Technique – Utilizing a simulation of 10,000 cryptocurrency portfolios comprising seven assets, including Ethereum (ETH), Bitcoin (BTC), Tether (USDT), Litecoin (LTC), Solana (SOL), Dogecoin (DOGE), and Polygon (MATIC), this study examines and compares the effects of different allocation frequencies (daily, weekly, and monthly) in time-based rebalancing and various threshold percentages (5%, 10%, and 15%) in threshold-based strategies on the portfolios' risk-adjusted returns, using the Sharpe ratio. The performance of these strategies is also compared with a passive buy-and-hold strategy. Findings – The research reveals statistically significant differences in the risk-adjusted returns between the buy-and-hold strategy and the daily rebalancing and threshold-based strategies with 5% and 10% threshold percentages. The daily rebalancing strategy demonstrates a higher Sharpe ratio, while lower threshold percentages lead to better risk-adjusted returns. Novelty – These empirical findings, using a simulation of 10,000 cryptocurrency portfolios, provide valuable insights into optimizing cryptocurrency portfolio performance through rebalancing strategies. Additionally, they highlight the effectiveness of implementing rebalancing techniques in cryptocurrency portfolios, contributing to the understanding of rebalancing optimization in this domain. Type of Paper - Empirical"

Suggested Citation

  • Nichanan Sakolvieng, 2024. "Optimizing Cryptocurrency Portfolios: A Comparative Study of Rebalancing Strategies," GATR Journals jfbr220, Global Academy of Training and Research (GATR) Enterprise.
    • Handle: RePEc:gtr:gatrjs:jfbr220
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.35609/jfbr.2024.8.4(1)
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://gatrenterprise.com/GATRJournals/JFBR/pdf_files/JFBR-Vol-8(4)/1.Sutta%20Sornmayura.pdf
    Download Restriction: http://gatrenterprise.com/GATRJournals/online_submission.html
    File URL: https://libkey.io/https://doi.org/10.35609/jfbr.2024.8.4(1)?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Cryptocurrency; Mean-Variance Optimization; Portfolio Management; Rebalancing Strategies; Risk-Adjusted Returns;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G11 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Portfolio Choice; Investment Decisions
    • G19 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Other

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gtr:gatrjs:jfbr220. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Prof. Dr. Abd Rahim Mohamad (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://gatrenterprise.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.