IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/gtr/gatrjs/gjbssr570.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Conflict of multiracial to nationality decision making using exploratory factor analysis: Multiracial Thai-Japanese in Thailand

Author

Listed:
  • Thanapum Limsiritong

    (Graduate school of Media and Governance, Keio University, Japan Author-2-Name: Tomoyuki Furutani Author-2-Workplace-Name: Keio university, 5322 Endo Kanagawa, 252-0882, Fujisawa, Japan Author-3-Name: Karnjira Limsiritong Author-3-Workplace-Name: Siam University, 38 Petchkasame rd Bangwa Phasi Charoen, 10160, Bangkok, Thailand Author-4-Name: Author-4-Workplace-Name: Author-5-Name: Author-5-Workplace-Name: Author-6-Name: Author-6-Workplace-Name: Author-7-Name: Author-7-Workplace-Name: Author-8-Name: Author-8-Workplace-Name:)

Abstract

Objective - When a major problem in governance policies creates great difficulties for the development of the global community, this has an influence of society's awareness of concepts such as racism, discrimination and conflict issues which have an impact on the decision making process of future generations of multiracial and foreigner migrants. Identity of nationality can also be used to explain changes in the structure of a county. This research aims to: (1) study the variables of nationality decision making factors among multiracial Thai-Japanese groups in Thailand; (2) categorize the factor extraction of Exploratory Factor Analysis on nationality decision making of multiracial Thai-Japanese groups in Thailand; and (3) explore the relationships between important factors of nationality decision making factor units among multiracial Thai-Japanese groups in Thailand. Methodology/Technique - The sample was research on educational models on the type of thesis at the graduate level from 2013 to present. The research instruments took three forms. The data analysis method used was the ATLAS.ti program using content analysis, frequency, and percentage. Finding - There were 685 valid respondents obtained using an online purposive sampling questionnaire survey in acknowledgement of organizations (Bangkok, Chon Buri & Chiangmai). The results indicate there are 3 factors of Thailand and 4 factors of Japan categorized for nationality decision making using exploratory factor analysis. Furthermore, the significance of each factor of Thailand and Japan affects nationality decision making. Finding - As a result of the binary logistic regression analysis, social structure, individual stability and country structure developments were identified as having a primary role in nationality decision making (Thai/Japanese/ and not decided or dual nationality). Novelty - The results enable an understanding of the Thai and Japanese international community transformation and development from the perspective of nationality decision making. Type of Paper - Empirical

Suggested Citation

  • Thanapum Limsiritong, 2020. "Conflict of multiracial to nationality decision making using exploratory factor analysis: Multiracial Thai-Japanese in Thailand," GATR Journals gjbssr570, Global Academy of Training and Research (GATR) Enterprise.
    • Handle: RePEc:gtr:gatrjs:gjbssr570
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://gatrenterprise.com/GATRJournals/GJBSSR/pdf_files/GJBSSRVol8(3)2020/6.Thanapum%20Limsiritong.pdf
    Download Restriction: http://gatrenterprise.com/GATRJournals/online_submission.html
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Exploratory Factor Analysis; Thai-Japanese; Nationality Decision Making.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • O19 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - International Linkages to Development; Role of International Organizations
    • O20 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Development Planning and Policy - - - General
    • O38 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Government Policy

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gtr:gatrjs:gjbssr570. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Prof. Dr. Abd Rahim Mohamad (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://gatrenterprise.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.