IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/grs/wpegrs/2008-12.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Non interference in the creation of French metropolitan areas: an indirect way to implicitly merge cities? (In French)

Author

Listed:
  • Olivier THOMAS (LEREPS-GRES)

Abstract

Considering that the French metropolitan area makers decided not to respect the 1999’s law and its spirit, this paper intends to highlight the reasons why the French State accepted this situation so easily. First, the degrees of freedom taken by local elected actors are stressed thanks to two examples : the determination of the list of common tasks on the one hand, and the choice of the boundaries of the metropolitan area on the other hand. Then, the idea that the French State, thanks to its non interference and to fiscal incentives, has chosen to go round local inertia with a tacit and indirect strategy is contended. The final long term goal would concern the will to reduce, in spite of the numerous opponents, the number of French cities.

Suggested Citation

  • Olivier THOMAS (LEREPS-GRES), 2008. "Non interference in the creation of French metropolitan areas: an indirect way to implicitly merge cities? (In French)," Cahiers du GRES (2002-2009) 2008-12, Groupement de Recherches Economiques et Sociales.
  • Handle: RePEc:grs:wpegrs:2008-12
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://cahiersdugres.u-bordeaux4.fr/2008/2008-12.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    French metropolitan areas; urban communities with own taxes; local public economics; merger; fiscal incentives;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • H30 - Public Economics - - Fiscal Policies and Behavior of Economic Agents - - - General
    • H73 - Public Economics - - State and Local Government; Intergovernmental Relations - - - Interjurisdictional Differentials and Their Effects
    • R51 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Regional Government Analysis - - - Finance in Urban and Rural Economies

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:grs:wpegrs:2008-12. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Vincent Frigant (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/gressfr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.