IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/gro/rugurs/325.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The effectiveness of an open planning process in obtaining public support - traffic planning in Groningen in the 1990's -

Author

Listed:
  • Tsubohara, S.

    (Groningen University)

Abstract

From 1995 to 1997, the municipality of Groningen was engaged in an open planning process to make a traffic plan, The Accessible City Livable (De Bereikbare Stad Leefbaar). This process, Things May Change (Het Kan Verkeeren), was regarded as a pilot project by the national government in terms of intensively involving the public from the beginning. The political executive of Groningen chose such a process to secure broad public support for the plan, through incorporating public opinion from the early stage on one hand and stimulating the public to change their existing views on the other. This paper examines whether this objective was achieved, paying attention not only to the content of each participation opportunity, but also to the plans themselves, which ought to reflect the result of participation. In fact, participants had hardly changed their views, and as a result the conflict of opinion between the environmental camp and the business camp had not been resolved through this process at all. Although the result of participation had revealed that the majority of citizens wanted to facilitate public transport and bicycles even at the expense of cars, the political executive after all made a plan that one-sidedly integrated the demands of the business community. The result of participation or just the fact that an open planning process was followed was used only to justify this plan. Therefore, many residents' and citizens' organisations expressed objections to the final product of participation.

Suggested Citation

  • Tsubohara, S., 2008. "The effectiveness of an open planning process in obtaining public support - traffic planning in Groningen in the 1990's -," Research Reports 325, University of Groningen, Urban and Regional Studies Institute (URSI).
  • Handle: RePEc:gro:rugurs:325
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://irs.ub.rug.nl/ppn/317340514
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gro:rugurs:325. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Hanneke Tamling (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ferugnl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.