IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/gfe/pfrp00/00020.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

La disciplina degli aiuti fiscali tra la funzione di controllo e quella di armonizzazione impropria: il ruolo della selettivitÃ

Author

Listed:
  • Marco Boccaccio

    (Università Sapienza di Roma - Dipartimento di Studi Giuridici, Filosofici ed Economici)

Abstract

Fiscal measures between proper state aid control and improper harmonization: the role of selectivity The notion of selectivity has gained the center stage in European state aid control. A wide interpretation of this notion can lead to an excessive limitation of Member States autonomy. This is particularly dangerous in the case of fiscal aids since Member States still retain exclusive power over direct taxation, and state aid can be misused so to partially overcome the political obstacles to tax harmonization. In this article it will be presented how the interpretation of selectivity evolved from the 1998 Commission Notice on state aid and direct taxation to the recent cases of tax rulings. This evolution has seen a parallel increase in the conflict between state aid control at european level and member State complaints in defence of their autonomy

Suggested Citation

  • Marco Boccaccio, 2016. "La disciplina degli aiuti fiscali tra la funzione di controllo e quella di armonizzazione impropria: il ruolo della selettivitÃ," Public Finance Research Papers 20, Istituto di Economia e Finanza, DSGE, Sapienza University of Rome.
  • Handle: RePEc:gfe:pfrp00:00020
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.dsge.uniroma1.it/sites/default/files/pubblicazioni/economia/e-pfrp20.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    European state aid control; direct taxation; selectivity.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • H25 - Public Economics - - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue - - - Business Taxes and Subsidies
    • K29 - Law and Economics - - Regulation and Business Law - - - Other
    • Z18 - Other Special Topics - - Cultural Economics - - - Public Policy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gfe:pfrp00:00020. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Valeria De Bonis (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ierosit.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.