IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/fth/louvis/9808.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Testing a Regression Model when we Have Smooth Alternatives in Mind

Author

Listed:
  • Hardle, W.
  • Kneip, A.

Abstract

Goodness-of-fit tests based on residual sum of squares are a standard procedure in fitiing regression models. Often we have a smooth alternative in mind, a qualitative feature that the X2-test does not take into account. We show that the power of detecting a smooth alternative increases when we smooth the current model as well. The proposed test is shown to be able to detect any continuous local alternative tending to zero slower than n-1/2. Theoretical results also address minimax nonparametric hypothesis testing in Sobolev spaces.

Suggested Citation

  • Hardle, W. & Kneip, A., 1998. "Testing a Regression Model when we Have Smooth Alternatives in Mind," Papers 9808, Catholique de Louvain - Institut de statistique.
    • Handle: RePEc:fth:louvis:9808
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    TESTING ; MODELS;

    JEL classification:

    • C12 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General - - - Hypothesis Testing: General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:fth:louvis:9808. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thomas Krichel (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.