The Reverse Regression Problem: Statistical Paradox or Artifact of Misspecification
AbstractThe usual approach to wage discrimination asks whether certain individuals receive lower wages for the same level of productivity characteristics. The reverse approach asks whether these individuals are more productive given the same wages. When these hypotheses are tested, incompatible conclusions seem to result. To circumvent specification problems, nonparametric techniques were used to estimate Canadian male-female wage/experience profiles. The findings indicate that, when the correct functional form is specified and the effects of childrearing activities are controlled for, there exists a wage/experience gap favoring men regardless of the approach, suggesting that the paradox may be simply an artifact of misspecification.
Download InfoTo our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.
Bibliographic InfoPaper provided by Laval - Recherche en Politique Economique in its series Papers with number 9204.
Length: 16 pages
Date of creation: 1992
Date of revision:
Contact details of provider:
Postal: UNIVERSITE LAVAL, GREPE DEPARTEMENT D'ECONOMIQUE, QUEBEC G1K 7P4.
Phone: (418) 656-5122
Fax: (418) 656-2707
Web page: http://www.ecn.ulaval.ca/
More information through EDIRC
labour market ; wages ; productivity ; economic models;
Other versions of this item:
- Jeff Racine & Paul Rilstone, 1995. "The Reverse Regression Problem: Statistical Paradox or Artefact of Misspecification?," Canadian Journal of Economics, Canadian Economics Association, vol. 28(3), pages 502-31, August.
You can help add them by filling out this form.
CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
- Stephen L. Ross, 2003. "What Is Known about Testing for Discrimination: Lessons Learned by Comparing across Different Markets," Working papers 2003-21, University of Connecticut, Department of Economics, revised Nov 2003.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Thomas Krichel).
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.