Measuring and Decomposing Productivity Change: Stochastic Distance Function Estimation VS. DEA
AbstractLinear programming techniques have been widely used to compute Malmquist indices of productivity change as ratios of fitted distances from a convex hull frontier. These indices are then decomposed into technical and efficiency change. However, since this approach is non-stochastic, inference is problematic. Further, although the Malmquist index is valid for any degree of returns to scale, productivity change is measured relative to a constant returns to scale frontier. As an alternative, we propose a exible, stochastic input distance frontier which allows for statistical inference and imposes no restrictions on returns to scale. Using this distance frontier, we decompose productivity change into technical and efficiency change. Comparisons are drawn between the stochastic and non-stochastic methods based on a panel of electric utilities. We estimate our model by the generalized method of moments with a variety of instrument sets to gauge the sensitivity of productivity change calculations to changes in the underlying moment conditions.
Download InfoTo our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.
Bibliographic InfoPaper provided by Georgia - College of Business Administration, Department of Economics in its series Papers with number 99-478.
Length: 24 pages
Date of creation: 2000
Date of revision:
Contact details of provider:
Postal: U.S.A.; The University of Georgia, College of Business Administration, Department of Economics, Athens, GA 30602
Web page: http://www.terry.uga.edu/
More information through EDIRC
TECHNICAL CHANGE ; EVALUATION ; ECONOMIC MODELS;
Find related papers by JEL classification:
- C10 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General - - - General
- C68 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Mathematical Methods; Programming Models; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling - - - Computable General Equilibrium Models
You can help add them by filling out this form.
CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
- Scott Atkinson & Jeffrey Dorfman, 2005.
"Multiple Comparisons with the Best: Bayesian Precision Measures of Efficiency Rankings,"
Journal of Productivity Analysis,
Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 359-382, 07.
- Dorfman, Jeffrey H. & Atkinson, Scott E., 2002. "Multiple Comparisons With The Best: Bayesian Precision Measures Of Efficiency Rankings," 2002 Annual meeting, July 28-31, Long Beach, CA 19800, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Thomas Krichel).
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.