Both researchers and practitioners claim that foreign investors acquire U.S. firms to gain access to reputable brands. There is, however, no empirical evidence to support this argument. This study uses 269 Japanese investments made in the US to test the hypothesis that Japanese investors' decision to acquire U.S. firms depends on both industry-specific reputation barriers and firm-specific marketing capabilities. We have found that Japanese investors are more likely to use acquisitions to enter a U.S. industry in which local competitors have erected higher reputation barriers. Inversely, Japanese investors endowed with more marketing resources are less likely to expand in the US through acquisitions. This study is the first that applies a vector of marketing variables to explain why Japanese manufacturers choose acquisitions over greenfield investments to enter the US.
Download Info
To our knowledge, this item is not available for
download. To find whether it is available, there are three
options:
1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page
whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be
available.
Find related papers by JEL classification: F20 - International Economics - - International Factor Movements and International Business - - - General F21 - International Economics - - International Factor Movements and International Business - - - International Investment; Long-Term Capital Movements F10 - International Economics - - Trade - - - General D81 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Criteria for Decision-Making under Risk and Uncertainty