IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/frz/wpaper/wp2019_25.rdf.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Does Money Illusion Matter? A Theoretical and Computational Model

Author

Listed:
  • Niccolò Zaccaria

Abstract

We based our work mainly on ‘Does Money Illusion Matter?’, by E. Fehr and J. R. Tyran (AER2001) in which the authors show experimental evidence of the presence of money illusion withinsubject groups. We build up a model which provides a formal and mathematical framework of theexperiment design, and it is in principle able to explain subjects’ behaviour within the experiment.Once we had analysed the dynamic properties of our model, we have run numerical simulationsin order to see whether we were able to get the same pattern found by the authors. It turns outthat not only our model is able to give a theoretical justification of the results found in the lab, butmoreover it is able to replicate the experimental series found by the two couple of authors, up to acertain degree of fitness. Then we used a replication of the original experiment by L. Petersen andA. Winn, ‘Does Money Illusion Matter?: Comment’, (AER 2014), to test for robustness of ourmodel.

Suggested Citation

  • Niccolò Zaccaria, 2019. "Does Money Illusion Matter? A Theoretical and Computational Model," Working Papers - Economics wp2019_25.rdf, Universita' degli Studi di Firenze, Dipartimento di Scienze per l'Economia e l'Impresa.
  • Handle: RePEc:frz:wpaper:wp2019_25.rdf
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.disei.unifi.it/upload/sub/pubblicazioni/repec/pdf/wp25_2019.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Money Illusion; Computational Model; Experiments;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:frz:wpaper:wp2019_25.rdf. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Giorgio Ricchiuti (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/defirit.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.