IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/fpr/resbrf/2.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

More or less ambition?: modeling the development impact of U.S.–EU agricultural proposals in the Doha Round

Author

Listed:
  • Bouet, Antoine
  • Mevel, Simon
  • Orden, David

Abstract

"What is at stake in the standoff between the United States and Europe over agriculture in the Doha Round of trade talks at the World Trade Organization (WTO)? What impact would an agreement based on greater or lesser levels of ambition have on developing countries, whose economies depend heavily on agriculture? Two years after the WTO talks broke down in Cancún, reform of the heavily protected and subsidized agricultural sectors of the United States and Europe remains a major impediment to progress. Using the MIRAGE computable general equilibrium model of the global economy, in this policy brief we compare different scenarios for the Doha agriculture negotiations, taking real numbers from the proposals currently on the table from the European Union (EU), the United States, and the G20 group of developing countries." from Text

Suggested Citation

  • Bouet, Antoine & Mevel, Simon & Orden, David, 2005. "More or less ambition?: modeling the development impact of U.S.–EU agricultural proposals in the Doha Round," Research briefs 2, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    • Handle: RePEc:fpr:resbrf:2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ifpri.org/cdmref/p15738coll2/id/72989/filename/72990.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:fpr:resbrf:2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ifprius.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.