IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/fpr/ifprid/2157.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Do agricultural projects help smallholders transition to better livelihood strategies?

Author

Listed:
  • Hazell, Peter
  • Timu, Anne G.
  • Savastano, Sara
  • Massotti, Piero

Abstract

Agricultural projects typically aim to promote the uptake of project components amongst targeted farm populations to improve their on-farm productivity within a “theory of change†that leads to improvements in their welfare. While this approach can be an important first step towards improving smallholder livelihoods, it ignores alternative and often superior livelihood options that might arise within the rural transformation process. These options can be particularly important for agricultural value chain projects that generate new market opportunities and secondary off-farm income and employment growth within the rural nonfarm economy. We argue that the design of smallholder projects implemented within regions already undergoing a dynamic transformation and/or on projects which have significant value chain components, should be broadened to assist smallholders make successful transitions to their best livelihood options. For such projects, M&E should also track livelihood transitions as well as the usual assessments of progress made, the achievement of expected goals, and the identification of bottlenecks in implementation. To help operationalize such an approach, we propose a typology of smallholder livelihood strategies that can track transitions over time and illustrate its use with an IFAD funded agricultural value chain project in Malawi. Using econometric methods and available household panel data, we find that the project helped some smallholders transition out of subsistence farming to market farming with a corresponding increase in their per capita incomes. The project also helped some households transition to, or remain with, an off-farm income diversification strategy with favorable per capita income outcomes. This may reflect new opportunities that arose as spillover benefits from the project along local agricultural value chains and within the rural nonfarm economy more broadly. We conclude with some lessons for the design, monitoring and evaluation of future agricultural projects.

Suggested Citation

  • Hazell, Peter & Timu, Anne G. & Savastano, Sara & Massotti, Piero, 2022. "Do agricultural projects help smallholders transition to better livelihood strategies?," IFPRI discussion papers 2157, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
  • Handle: RePEc:fpr:ifprid:2157
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ifpri.org/cdmref/p15738coll2/id/136520/filename/136730.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    MALAWI; SOUTHERN AFRICA; AFRICA SOUTH OF SAHARA; AFRICA; agriculture; smallholders; livelihoods; impact assessment; small farms; agricultural projects; typologies of small farms; small farm transitions;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:fpr:ifprid:2157. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ifprius.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.