The exponential growth of hedge funds, their role in financial crises in the 1990s, and examples of fraudulent behaviour have precipitated a heated debate over their regulatory status. The existing approaches of greater disclosure and activity restrictions appear too blunt to be effective and may stifle the benefits hedge funds can bring to the financial system. But, even the remote possibility of a systemic crisis weighs against no regulation. If reform is delayed until after a crisis it is likely to be politically influenced and sub-optimal. We argue that any reform should involve both the promotion of measures to reduce the likelihood of failure of a major hedge fund and crisis management procedures to address any fallout if this occurs.
Download Info
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Publisher Info
Paper provided by Financial Markets Group in its series FMG Discussion Papers with number
dp518.