IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/fip/fednls/86860.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Pick Your Poison: How Money Market Funds Reacted to Financial Stress in 2011

Author

Listed:

Abstract

The summer of 2011 was an unsettling period for financial markets. In the United States, Congress was unable to agree to terms for raising the debt ceiling until August, creating considerable uncertainty over whether the government would be forced to default on its debt. In Europe, the borrowing costs of some peripheral countries increased dramatically, raising questions about the health of some of the largest banks. In this post, we analyze data recently made public by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to see how the U.S. money market mutual fund (MMF) industry reacted to these stresses. We conclude that MMFs appeared to be more concerned with the European debt crisis because they increased their holdings of U.S. Treasuries and other government securities while decreasing their holdings of financial securities issued by European banks over that period.

Suggested Citation

  • Neel Krishnan & Antoine Martin & Asani Sarkar, 2013. "Pick Your Poison: How Money Market Funds Reacted to Financial Stress in 2011," Liberty Street Economics 20130306, Federal Reserve Bank of New York.
  • Handle: RePEc:fip:fednls:86860
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://libertystreeteconomics.newyorkfed.org/2013/03/pick-your-poison-how-money-market-funds-reacted-to-financial-stress-in-2011.html
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    debt ceiling 2011; money market mutual funds (MMF); European debt crisis; Treasury securities;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G2 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services
    • H0 - Public Economics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:fip:fednls:86860. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Gabriella Bucciarelli (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/frbnyus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.