IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/fau/wpaper/wp087.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Hodnocení pracoviš výzkumu a vývoje / Evaluation of R&D Institutions [available in Czech only]

Author

Abstract

The Czech Council for R&D developed a new version of the Methodic for the Evaluation of R&D. In this paper, we discuss especially three criteria from this Methodic: - publications in impacted journals - publications in other scientific refereed journals - evaluation of publications with more authors. The first criterion ignores the birth of a new interdisciplinary database SCOPUS, in the second criterion, a clear definition of a scientific journal is missing. The third criterion we only briefly mention in relation with other problems. We provide the general information about both the SCOPUS and Ulrich’s Periodicals Directory databases, the second one explicitly working with the category „scientific periodical“ and because of that useable for the implementation of the second criterion. We mention another possibility to categorize a scientific journal. We provide information about two methodic for the evaluation of R&D institutions used in the world. In conclusions, we summarize our recommendations.

Suggested Citation

  • Tomáš Cahlík & Hana Pessrová, 2005. "Hodnocení pracoviš výzkumu a vývoje / Evaluation of R&D Institutions [available in Czech only]," Working Papers IES 87, Charles University Prague, Faculty of Social Sciences, Institute of Economic Studies, revised 2005.
    • Handle: RePEc:fau:wpaper:wp087
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://ies.fsv.cuni.cz/default/file/download/id/2550
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    research and development; evaluation; databases;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • L31 - Industrial Organization - - Nonprofit Organizations and Public Enterprise - - - Nonprofit Institutions; NGOs; Social Entrepreneurship
    • H41 - Public Economics - - Publicly Provided Goods - - - Public Goods
    • H43 - Public Economics - - Publicly Provided Goods - - - Project Evaluation; Social Discount Rate

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:fau:wpaper:wp087. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Natalie Svarcova (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/icunicz.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.