IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/eti/rpdpjp/17023.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

[WTO Case Review Series No.19] United States—Measures Affecting the Importation of Animals, Meat and Other Animal Products from Argentina (WT/DS447): A delay in the review procedures upon request for imports and the SPS Agreement (Japanese)

Author

Listed:
  • ISHIKAWA Yoshimichi

Abstract

Even if animal diseases occur within a country, the World Organisation for Animal Health (OIE) may officially recognize either its entire territory or a region thereof as disease-free on the conditions of undertaking vaccination and so on. Based upon this official recognition, this country normally requires importing Members adopting sanitary and phytosanitary (SPS) measures against its products to reopen the market. In response to this request, importing Members are required to launch review procedures, including a risk assessment. However, when the veterinary authorities of importing Members fail to complete their review procedures within a certain period of time (in this dispute, the United States took almost 12 years), such a delay allowing the SPS measures at issue to continue might lead to significant restrictions on international trade. Thus, this article will explore how the SPS Agreement is designed to discipline a delay in the review procedure upon request for imports by exporting Members through not only procedural (Article 8, Appendix C) but also substantive provisions (e.g., Articles 2, 3, 5, and 6). It will also attempt to examine the possible implications derived from this case for Japan's agricultural policy.

Suggested Citation

  • ISHIKAWA Yoshimichi, 2017. "[WTO Case Review Series No.19] United States—Measures Affecting the Importation of Animals, Meat and Other Animal Products from Argentina (WT/DS447): A delay in the review procedures upon request for ," Policy Discussion Papers (Japanese) 17023, Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI).
  • Handle: RePEc:eti:rpdpjp:17023
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rieti.go.jp/jp/publications/pdp/17p023.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eti:rpdpjp:17023. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: TANIMOTO, Toko (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/rietijp.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.