IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ete/kbiper/507126.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Time to default in credit scoring using survival analysis: a benchmark study

Author

Listed:
  • Lore Dirick
  • Gerda Claeskens
  • Bart Baesens

Abstract

We investigate the performance of various survival analysis techniques applied to ten actual credit data sets from Belgian and UK financial institutions. In the comparison we consider classical survival analysis techniques, namely the accelerated failure time models and Cox proportional hazards regression models, as well as Cox proportional hazard regression models with splines in the hazard function. Mixture cure models for single and multiple events were more recently introduced in the credit risk context. The performance of these models is evaluated using both a statistical evaluation and an economic approach through the use of annuity theory. It is found that spline-based methods and the single event mixture cure model perform well in the credit risk context.

Suggested Citation

  • Lore Dirick & Gerda Claeskens & Bart Baesens, 2015. "Time to default in credit scoring using survival analysis: a benchmark study," Working Papers of Department of Decision Sciences and Information Management, Leuven 507126, KU Leuven, Faculty of Economics and Business (FEB), Department of Decision Sciences and Information Management, Leuven.
  • Handle: RePEc:ete:kbiper:507126
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://lirias.kuleuven.be/retrieve/334254
    File Function: Time to default in credit scoring using survival analysis: a benchmark study
    Download Restriction: KU Leuven intranet only, request a copy at https://lirias.kuleuven.be/handle/123456789/507126
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ete:kbiper:507126. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: library EBIB (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://feb.kuleuven.be/KBI .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.