IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ess/wpaper/id7531.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Environmental Regulations and Compliance in the Textile Processing Sector in Pakistan: Empirical Evidence

Author

Listed:
  • Ghulam Samad
  • Waseem Gulzar
  • Vaqar Ahmed

Abstract

This paper, seeks to understand why firms in the garment and textile sector choose to comply with or ignore Pakistan’s environmental regulations and effluent standards. Based on survey of 60 firms, it is found that there are nine different environmental management practices adopted in the textile sector. While only 12% of the sample adopted all nine practices, 50% embraced more than five practices and some 87% of firms adopted at least two environmental management practices. The most common environmental practice adopted is evaluation of any chemical hazards. It was found that institutional deficiencies in implementation such as inadequate monitoring and fines hinder enforcement and compliance. However, non-regulatory pressures from international customers and competitors act as a major un-official source of influence. Local factors such as community and local media stressors seem to have limited impacts. As expected, larger firms are more likely to adopt environmental management practices relative to medium sized firms. Thus, the paper propose three strategies to improve environmental compliance – installation of effluent treatment technology matched with improved monitoring, creating a rating system to trigger competition among firms and offering firms training and information services at the district-level.

Suggested Citation

  • Ghulam Samad & Waseem Gulzar & Vaqar Ahmed, 2015. "Environmental Regulations and Compliance in the Textile Processing Sector in Pakistan: Empirical Evidence," Working Papers id:7531, eSocialSciences.
  • Handle: RePEc:ess:wpaper:id:7531
    Note: Institutional Papers
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.esocialsciences.org/Download/repecDownload.aspx?fname=A2015923163451_29.pdf&fcategory=Articles&AId=7531&fref=repec
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ess:wpaper:id:7531. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Padma Prakash (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.esocialsciences.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.