IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ess/wpaper/id2076.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Agricultural Subsidies and Negotiations: Strategies and Options

Author

Listed:
  • Parthapratim Pal

Abstract

The implementation experience of the Uruguay Round (UR) indicates that the Agreement on Agriculture (AoA) was unable to curb the widespread use of domestic farm subsidies by developed countries.This paper analyses the provisions of Annex A of the July Framework and shows that, by itself, the July Package will not lead to any real decrease in the domestic levels of subsidies in developed countries. This paper points out that there are some waivers built into the Framework, which may allow developed countries to maintain and, in some cases, even to increase domestic farm support and still remain WTO-consistent. However, in most cases, the July Framework only provides broad guidelines and leaves the specific modalities of subsidy reduction to be decided through negotiations. It will be possible for negotiators to plug some of these loopholes if appropriate subsidy reduction formulae are used. This forms the crux of the current phase of negotiations on domestic subsidies. [CENTAD Hong Kong Series- 2]

Suggested Citation

  • Parthapratim Pal, 2009. "Agricultural Subsidies and Negotiations: Strategies and Options," Working Papers id:2076, eSocialSciences.
  • Handle: RePEc:ess:wpaper:id:2076
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.eSocialSciences.com/data/articles/Document11962009210.2139704.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Agricultural Negotiations; July Framework; WTO; India;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ess:wpaper:id:2076. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Padma Prakash (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.esocialsciences.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.