IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ess/wpaper/id11580.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

How have States Designed their School Education Budgets?

Author

Listed:
  • Child Rights and You CRY
  • Centre for Budget and Governance Accountability CBGA

Abstract

After the implementation of the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act (RTE) in 2010, states have brought about some improvement in school education in terms of infrastructure, enrolment, attainment, etc. The study examines whether states have injected more money into elementary education to accomplish the goal of RTE or it is routine incremental budgeting. The study also tries to answer larger questions like how inclusive is the public provisioning for education. While designing their budgets, in the planning and budgeting process, are states taking into consideration the requirements of socially- and economically-weaker sections of children like girls, Scheduled Castes (SCs), Scheduled Tribes (STs) and Muslims?

Suggested Citation

  • Child Rights and You CRY & Centre for Budget and Governance Accountability CBGA, 2017. "How have States Designed their School Education Budgets?," Working Papers id:11580, eSocialSciences.
    • Handle: RePEc:ess:wpaper:id:11580
    Note: Institutional Papers
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.esocialsciences.org/Download/repecDownload.aspx?fname=A201711815317_20.pdf&fcategory=Articles&AId=11580&fref=repec
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Vimala Ramachandran & Nishi Mehrotra & Kameshwari Jandhyala, 2009. "Incentives in Elementary Education - do They Make a Difference," Working Papers id:2164, eSocialSciences.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ess:wpaper:id:11580. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Padma Prakash (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.esocialsciences.org .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.