Non-contractual liability for breaches of EU law. The tension between corrective and distributive justice
AbstractCorrective justice has been one of the most common arguments for justifying the aim and funtion of non-contractual liability for breaches of EU law. According to this approach, that liability is a mechanism to recompose the state of the art of an order composed of rights, liberties and duties, after some of its rules have been infringed. This paper examines the premises of that reasoning proving that the lack of clarity on how these premises are settled makes corrective justice explanation difficult to maintain. Instead, it shows that distributive justice criteria will be considered as an essential element of state liability in the EU sphere.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoPaper provided by RECON in its series RECON Online Working Papers Series with number 24.
Date of creation: 15 Nov 2010
Date of revision:
Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://www.reconproject.eu
European Court of Justice; European law; non-contractual liability;
This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:
- NEP-ALL-2010-12-11 (All new papers)
You can help add them by filling out this form.
reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.Access and download statisticsgeneral information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Marit Eldholm).
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.