Advanced Search
MyIDEAS: Login

Tracking Judicial Dialogue-The Scope for Preliminary Rulings from the Italian Constitutional Court

Contents:

Author Info

  • Marco Dani
Registered author(s):

    Abstract

    Abstract: In cases 102-103/2008 for the first time the Italian Constitutional Court has referred a question to the Court of Justice under the article 234 EC procedure. The article analyses this decision in light of previous contrary case law and argues that, insofar as supremacy will be construed according to the Simmenthal doctrine, the scope for preliminary ruling from that Constitutional Courtwill be rather narrow, as mainly limited to principaliter proceedings. Such a conclusion brings about an important theoretical implication. Constitutional Courts such as the Italian one will face difficulties in interacting directly with the Court of Justice and, notably, in conveying at supranational level the authentic versions of national constitutional traditions. Conversely, ordinary courts seem in a better position to play a similar role. As a consequence, if we want the Court of Justice to modify its octroyée methodology of construing common constitutional traditions, we have to place all our stakes on a judicial dialogue based on ordinary courts as the privileged interface between the EU and national constitutional environments.

    Download Info

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
    File URL: http://centers.law.nyu.edu/jeanmonnet/papers/08/081001.html
    File Function: Contents/abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://centers.law.nyu.edu/jeanmonnet/papers/081001.pdf
    File Function: Part of text
    Download Restriction: no

    Bibliographic Info

    Paper provided by Jean Monnet Chair in its series Jean Monnet Working Papers with number 10.

    as in new window
    Length:
    Date of creation: 08 Dec 2008
    Date of revision:
    Handle: RePEc:erp:jeanmo:p0207

    Contact details of provider:
    Web page: http://www.jeanmonnetprogram.org/

    Related research

    Keywords: fundamental/human rights; judicial review; supremacy; European Court of Justice; Italy;

    References

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    Citations

    Lists

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:erp:jeanmo:p0207. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Charlie Pike).

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.