Advanced Search
MyIDEAS: Login to save this paper or follow this series

Mainstreaming Gender in the European Union: Getting the Incentives Right

Contents:

Author Info

  • Emilie M. Hafner-Burton, Mark A. Pollack
Registered author(s):

    Abstract

    Abstract: The European Union, like many other international organizations and governments, committed itself during the 1990s to the mainstreaming of gender issues across all policy areas at all stages in the policy process. Nonetheless, more than a decade after the Union’s initial commitment, this commitment has not led to consistent and effective implementation. The problem, we argue, lies in the failure to get the incentives right, mobilizing sufficient interest among crucial actors, beginning within the bureaucracy of the international organizations or governments in question. Organizations like the European Commission are more successful in achieving their objectives when they provide hard incentives for bureaucrats to implement reforms. Cross-cutting mandates are less successful when they depend exclusively on soft incentives such as persuasion and socialization. This has been the case, we demonstrate, within the Commission, which has relied exclusively on soft incentives in its implementation of gender mainstreaming, with highly variable results after over a decade. By contrast, we demonstrate, the Commission has utilized hard incentives in the adoption of another cross-cutting mandate, on equal opportunities for men and women officials, resulting in rapid, quantifiable progress. The limited impact of gender mainstreaming on EU policy outputs, therefore, reflects not an inherent flaw of the mainstreaming concept, but rather the Commission’s choice to rely almost exclusively on soft incentives in implementation.

    Download Info

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
    File URL: http://centers.law.nyu.edu/jeanmonnet/papers/08/080801.html
    File Function: Contents/abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://centers.law.nyu.edu/jeanmonnet/papers/080801.pdf
    File Function: Part of text
    Download Restriction: no

    Bibliographic Info

    Paper provided by Jean Monnet Chair in its series Jean Monnet Working Papers with number 8.

    as in new window
    Length:
    Date of creation: 17 Nov 2008
    Date of revision:
    Handle: RePEc:erp:jeanmo:p0205

    Contact details of provider:
    Web page: http://www.jeanmonnetprogram.org/

    Related research

    Keywords: European Commission;

    References

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    Citations

    Lists

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:erp:jeanmo:p0205. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Charlie Pike).

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.