Deliberation and the problem of democratic legitimacy in the EU: Are working agreements the most that can be expected?
AbstractWhat kind of democracy does the EU require and what model of deliberative democracy can account for post-national legitimacy? The author contends that democracy can only prevail with egalitarian procedures of law making in place through which the citizens can influence the laws that affect them. A model premised on the presuppositions of an idealized discourse should be confined to some very limited sets of constitutional questions and be supplemented with a variant of democratic discourse modelled on a less demanding concept of democratic legitimacy. The concept of a working agreement is introduced in order to establish such concept legitimacy as well as to account for the constitutional developments of the EU.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoPaper provided by ARENA in its series ARENA Working Papers with number 8.
Date of creation: 10 Apr 2006
Date of revision:
Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://www.arena.uio.no/
deliberative democracy; Constitution for Europe; normative political theory; constitution building; legitimacy;
This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:
- NEP-ALL-2006-11-18 (All new papers)
You can help add them by filling out this form.
CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
- Chen Zhao, 2008. "Deliberation or bargaining? An analysis on the Convention on the future of Europe," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 6(3), pages 427-440, November.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Sindre Eikrem Hervig).
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.