This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Decentralised Integration as a New Model of Joint Exercise of Community Functions?

Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics
Author Info
Edoardo Chiti
Abstract

According to the original scheme of the ‘Founding Fathers’, the relations between supranational authorities and national administrations were to be characterised by a strict separation of their respective spheres of competence. This did in fact hold true, at least in the original treaties regulating the Communities. Over the years this framework has been so thoroughly modified that administrative collaboration as a legal reality has become one of the EU’s distinguishing features. As a result, a relatively simple constitutional structure has been rendered slowly but surely more complicated by an increasingly articulated administrative system. The present administrative system is characterised by the fact that the powers relating to the Community public functions are conferred upon a number of structurally separate authorities, whose nature is national, supranational or, sometimes, a composite of the two. The European Community assumes the form of permanent interaction and even merger of what were originally two distinct legal systems. This paper focuses on the relatively new, and most impressive and original technique of administrative integration: the adoption of a number of Community regulations for specific sectors, to be implemented not just by a supranational administration (central or peripheral), but by a plurality of national, supranational and sometimes mixed authorities, with a special role assigned to a Community office. The purpose of this paper is to consider the various regulations by sector as variants of an emerging general model of exercise for certain Community functions. It will be argued that such a general model is presently in the process of consolidation, notwithstanding the variety of approaches adopted by European legislators.

Download Info
To download:

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. Information about this may be contained in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: http://www.arena.uio.no/publications/working-papers2002/papers/02_31.xml
File Format: text/html
File Function: Full text
Download Restriction: no

Publisher Info
Paper provided by ARENA in its series ARENA Working Papers with number 31.

Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML (with abstract), plain text (with abstract), BibTeX, RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite), ReDIF
Length:
Date of creation: 01 Oct 2002
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:erp:arenax:p0094

Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://www.arena.uio.no/

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Ragnar Lie).

Related research
Keywords: decentralisation; governance; multilevel governance; network approach;

This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

Statistics
Access and download statistics

Did you know? You may want to explore EconPapers, which displays the same data as IDEAS in a different way.

This page was last updated on 2009-12-2.


This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.