IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/erg/wpaper/1497.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Does Maternal Education Curb Female Genital Mutilation? Evidence from a Natural experiment in Egypt

Author

Listed:
  • Ahmed Shoukry Rashad

    (Dubai Department of Economic Development, Government of Dubai)

  • Mesbah Fathy Sharaf

    (University of Alberta)

Abstract

In this study, we exploit a natural experiment, an education policy change reducing compulsory schooling from nine to eight years in Egypt, to estimate the causal impact of maternal education on mothers’ attitude toward female genital mutilation (FGM), the probability that their daughters undergo FGM, and their intention to perform FGM to her daughters in the future. We use a nationally representative sample of 16,572 ever-married women aged between 15-49 from the 2008 Egypt’s Demographic and Health Survey and utilize a fuzzy regression discontinuity (FRD) framework to estimate the causal impact of maternal education on the three FGM outcomes. Our main findings suggest that maternal education did not discourage the actual implementation of the FGM practice in Egypt. It did not reduce either the probability of having a circumcised daughter or the motivation to perform FGM in the future. However, our results suggest maternal education had a favorable impact on the sentiment toward the FGM practice. The unexpected results maybe explained by the poor quality of schooling in Egypt on human capital protection and the power of traditionalism versus education

Suggested Citation

  • Ahmed Shoukry Rashad & Mesbah Fathy Sharaf, 2021. "Does Maternal Education Curb Female Genital Mutilation? Evidence from a Natural experiment in Egypt," Working Papers 1497, Economic Research Forum, revised 20 Oct 2021.
    • Handle: RePEc:erg:wpaper:1497
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://erf.org.eg/publications/does-maternal-education-curb-female-genital-mutilation-evidence-from-a-natural-experiment-in-egypt-2/
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://bit.ly/3nMJhRF
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:erg:wpaper:1497. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sherine Ghoneim (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/erfaceg.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.