IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/erg/wpaper/1412.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Do Relative Concerns Matter? Testing Consumption Categories

Author

Listed:
  • Ünay Tamgaç

    (TOBB University of Economics and Technology)

  • Asena Caner

Abstract

It is well-known that relative concerns influence many economic choices, including consumption decisions of households. In this paper, we test the conspicuous consumption hypothesis. In particular, we test whether non-rich households are affected by the consumption of the rich and increase their consumption of visible items to signal high status. This is one of the few studies that investigates status signaling in a developing country setting. We use nationally representative data from the Turkish Household Budget Survey that covers the years 2003-2012, a period of high economic growth. The conspicuous consumption hypothesis is validated for highly visible nondurable consumption items that possess signaling value. In contrast, we find no evidence for a similar effect on the consumption of non-visible items by the non-rich. We interpret our findings in light of the economic experience of the country within the last decade.

Suggested Citation

  • Ünay Tamgaç & Asena Caner, 2020. "Do Relative Concerns Matter? Testing Consumption Categories," Working Papers 1412, Economic Research Forum, revised 20 Nov 2020.
  • Handle: RePEc:erg:wpaper:1412
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://erf.org.eg/publications/do-relative-concerns-matter-testing-consumption-categories/
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://bit.ly/3kjF58l
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:erg:wpaper:1412. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sherine Ghoneim (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/erfaceg.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.