IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/eps/cepswp/13508.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Stakeholders� Views on the Ecodesign Directive

Author

Listed:
  • Egenhofer, Christian
  • Drabik, Eleanor
  • Alessi, Monica
  • Rizos, Vasileios

Abstract

The Ecodesign Directive (ED) provides consistent EU-wide rules for improving the environmental performance of products, such as household appliances, information and communication technologies or engineering. This report summarises the responses of 27 stakeholders who were interviewed to obtain their assessment of the implementation of the ED, particularly the successes and shortcomings, the results and the processes and the Directive�s contribution to encouraging the circular economy. The objective was to gather the views of both EU-level and Member State experts and stakeholders on the following questions: To what extent has the Directive met its objectives? What are the main obstacles in the implementation? How does the ED interact with other policies? How does the Directive contribute to the circular economy? Full Title: "Stakeholders� Views on the Ecodesign Directive: An assessment of the successes and shortcomings" This paper was written at the request of the Ex-Post Evaluation of the Directorate for Impact Assessment and European Added Value, within the Directorate General for Parliamentary Research Services (DG EPRS) of the General Secretariat of the European Parliament, and can be downloaded from the Parliament�s website. It is republished as a CEPS Research Report with the kind permission of the European Parliament.

Suggested Citation

  • Egenhofer, Christian & Drabik, Eleanor & Alessi, Monica & Rizos, Vasileios, 2018. "Stakeholders� Views on the Ecodesign Directive," CEPS Papers 13508, Centre for European Policy Studies.
  • Handle: RePEc:eps:cepswp:13508
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ceps.eu/system/files/RRNo2018_02_EcoDesignDirective.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eps:cepswp:13508. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Margarita Minkova (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepssbe.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.