IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/eps/cepswp/13285.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Is security of energy supply possible without deeper cross-border market integration? Lessons from the cold spell in South-Eastern Europe

Author

Listed:
  • Egenhofer, Christian
  • Stroia, Cristian

Abstract

In late December 2016 and early 2017, South Eastern Europe experienced an extended cold spell lasting almost six weeks and triggering an electricity �crisis�, which seriously affected EU member states as well as Energy Community countries, notably Bulgaria, Romania, Greece and FYR of Macedonia. These countries opted to tackle the actual or perceived supply situation via a traditional path of administrative interventions, based on a purely national perspective and requiring the addition of considerable capacity. This approach departed sharply from the solutions discussed within the Central and South Eastern Europe Energy Connectivity (CESEC) initiative, launched by the European Commission in 2015 with the aim of integrating markets to address energy security in the region. One of the possible outcomes from the cold spell might well be that governments in the region come to realise that they have few options other than to integrate with their neighbours, increase energy efficiency and support renewable energy, whose cost by now is comparable to conventional sources and, given its scalability, poses less economic risks for investors.

Suggested Citation

  • Egenhofer, Christian & Stroia, Cristian, 2017. "Is security of energy supply possible without deeper cross-border market integration? Lessons from the cold spell in South-Eastern Europe," CEPS Papers 13285, Centre for European Policy Studies.
  • Handle: RePEc:eps:cepswp:13285
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ceps.eu/system/files/PI_No2017_44_ColdSpell.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    electricity crisis; regional cooperation; energy security;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eps:cepswp:13285. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Margarita Minkova (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepssbe.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.