IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/epa/cepapb/2012-05.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Retirement Readiness in North Carolina

Author

Listed:

Abstract

This study utilizes data from the Current Population Survey (CPS) to compute sponsorship trends in North Carolina. The decrease in sponsorship rates, coupled with low rates of participation in retirement accounts and inadequate accumulated savings to sustain one's living standards in retirement are cause for concern. The numbers in this report indicate that 47% of North Carolina workers nearing retirement will be poor or near poor if they retire at age 65. Sixty-three percent of workers aged 55-64 without any workplace retirement plan are projected to be poor or near poor, compared to 27% of workers who have a retirement plan and are actively participating.

Suggested Citation

  • Teresa Ghilarducci & Joelle Saad-Lessler & Lauren Schmitz, 2012. "Retirement Readiness in North Carolina," SCEPA publication series. 2012-05, Schwartz Center for Economic Policy Analysis (SCEPA), The New School.
  • Handle: RePEc:epa:cepapb:2012-05
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.economicpolicyresearch.org/images/docs/research/retirement_security/NCarolina%20Retirement%20readiness.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Retirement; Social Security; North Carolina;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • J26 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demand and Supply of Labor - - - Retirement; Retirement Policies
    • H55 - Public Economics - - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies - - - Social Security and Public Pensions
    • E21 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - Consumption, Saving, Production, Employment, and Investment - - - Consumption; Saving; Wealth

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:epa:cepapb:2012-05. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Bridget Fisher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cenewus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.