IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ems/euriss/77403.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Force, fraud, and coercion : Bridging from knowledge of intercountry adoption to global surrogacy

Author

Listed:
  • Smith Rotabi, K.

Abstract

This report discusses concerns raised by participants of Thematic Area 4 (Force, Fraud and Coercion) of the International Forum on Intercountry Adoption and Global Surrogacy held in August 2014. There has been a significant body of research on intercountry adoption practices over the past 30 years; force, fraud, and coercion have been identified in a small but important component of the literature. However, this knowledge in intercountry adoption has not yet truly bridged into research in global surrogacy with some recent exceptions. Learning from the past of ICA and connecting the evidence is particularly relevant due to the fact that the need for international law focused on global surrogacy and issues of parentage has been considered. The lessons learned from a history of corruption and human rights abuses are important to integrate when formulating future international law and regulations to protect vulnerable peoples in global surrogacy practices. Concepts of exploitation and human trafficking are explored with considerations of how to prevent, protect, and prosecute as emergent focal points of discourse. Effective prosecution of crimes, implications for a convention on global surrogacy, exploitation in global surrogacy arrangements, emotional safeguards for surrogate mothers, limited knowledge about the sense of origin, and experiences of children born through surrogacy are all areas in need of continued research.

Suggested Citation

  • Smith Rotabi, K., 2014. "Force, fraud, and coercion : Bridging from knowledge of intercountry adoption to global surrogacy," ISS Working Papers - General Series 77403, International Institute of Social Studies of Erasmus University Rotterdam (ISS), The Hague.
  • Handle: RePEc:ems:euriss:77403
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://repub.eur.nl/pub/77403/wp600.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nigel Cantwell, 2014. "The Best Interests of the Child in Intercountry Adoption," Papers innins712, Innocenti Insights.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Cheney, K.E., 2014. "Executive summary of the International Forum on Intercountry Adoption and Global Surrogacy," ISS Working Papers - General Series 77408, International Institute of Social Studies of Erasmus University Rotterdam (ISS), The Hague.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Selman, P., 2014. "Intercountry Adoption Agencies and the HCIA," ISS Working Papers - General Series 77404, International Institute of Social Studies of Erasmus University Rotterdam (ISS), The Hague.
    2. Cheney, K.E., 2014. "Executive summary of the International Forum on Intercountry Adoption and Global Surrogacy," ISS Working Papers - General Series 77408, International Institute of Social Studies of Erasmus University Rotterdam (ISS), The Hague.
    3. Högbacka, R., 2014. "Intercountry adoption, countries of origin, and biological families," ISS Working Papers - General Series 77406, International Institute of Social Studies of Erasmus University Rotterdam (ISS), The Hague.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ems:euriss:77403. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: RePub (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/issssnl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.