IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ema/worpap/2017-05.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Harmonization of R&D Tax Credits across the European Union: Nonsense or common sense?

Author

Listed:
  • Laurence Jacquet
  • Stéphane Robin

    (Université de Cergy-Pontoise, THEMA)

Abstract

We examine the relevance of R&D tax credits as incentives to spur investment in R&D throughout the European Union (EU) and discuss the relevance and feasibility of harmonizing these tax-based policy instruments across Member States. Based on a thorough investigation of the instruments implemented in five selected European countries (Belgium, France, Italy, the Netherlands and the UK), we argue that the main obstacle to harmonization lies in the great diversity of instruments and eligibility conditions that currently prevail across the EU. We conduct a subsidiarity test, which suggests that, if the EU decides to move towards a harmonized R&D tax credit framework, it should at least impose a minimal level of tax rebate at the EU level, possibly complemented by additional country-level incentives. We highlight that the recent proposal of a Common Consolidated Corporate Tax Base (CCCTB) goes further than this minimal EU-level tax credit, by suggesting to implement a “super-deduction” that would allow EU-based firms to deduce more than 100% of their R&D expenditures from their tax base. We also discuss, as far as the harmonization of R&D tax credits is concerned, possible implication of Brexit both for the UK and for the EU. To complement our reflection and discussion, we develop an econometric analysis on our five selected countries. The super‐deduction proposed by the European Commission (EC) has its roots in the conviction that economic growth in Europe can only be knowledge-based, and that the current level of R&D investment in the EU is too low. The EC hopes that the super‐deduction will boost R&D investment across Europe, which is assumed to be conducive to more innovation and, ultimately, more growth. Our econometric analysis allows us to test whether this hope is empirically grounded, by examining whether the R&D tax credits implemented in the five aforementioned EU countries have spurred R&D and innovation (measured by patenting intensity) between 1980 and 2007. We find that the R&D conducted when a tax credit is available is associated with more R&D in the future in all five countries, and with more innovation in three countries out of five. However, we do not find any causal effect of the tax credit on innovation.

Suggested Citation

  • Laurence Jacquet & Stéphane Robin, 2017. "Harmonization of R&D Tax Credits across the European Union: Nonsense or common sense?," THEMA Working Papers 2017-05, THEMA (THéorie Economique, Modélisation et Applications), Université de Cergy-Pontoise.
  • Handle: RePEc:ema:worpap:2017-05
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://thema.u-cergy.fr/IMG/pdf/2017-05.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    European Policy; Tax Harmonization; R&D Tax Credit; Innovation Policy;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • H25 - Public Economics - - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue - - - Business Taxes and Subsidies
    • H54 - Public Economics - - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies - - - Infrastructures
    • H77 - Public Economics - - State and Local Government; Intergovernmental Relations - - - Intergovernmental Relations; Federalism
    • H87 - Public Economics - - Miscellaneous Issues - - - International Fiscal Issues; International Public Goods
    • F36 - International Economics - - International Finance - - - Financial Aspects of Economic Integration
    • O31 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Innovation and Invention: Processes and Incentives
    • O38 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Government Policy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ema:worpap:2017-05. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Stefania Marcassa (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/themafr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.