IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/els/esrcls/021.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Exploring task allocation within ant cofoundress associations

Author

Listed:
  • S. W. Rissing
  • G. B. Pollock

Abstract

Cofoundresses of the desert leaf-cutter ant Acromyrmex versicolor exhibit above-ground surface excavation specialization and foraging specialization prior to eclosion of the first adult workers; the foundress displaying the former task specialization assumes the latter specialization significantly more often than expected randomly. Determination of both task specializations is not correlated with relative cofoundress mass; nor is there evidence of overt or ritualized aggression. Excavation specialists retain their task specialization when paired with "non-excavating" foundresses from other nests, but both types of foundress can assume the complementary role if paired with an individual of their original task specialization. There is no evidence of a "war of attrition" among cofoundresses at colony initiation; rather, our data seem consistent with a "coordination mechanism" within economic game theory where roles are assigned through differentially-experienced, arbitrary events beyond individual control. When the conditions of coordination are removed, however, cofoundresses exhibit behaviour consistent with a war of attrition. Coordination and a war of attrition need not be conflicting explanations but are rather complementary, contingent on divergent conditions.

Suggested Citation

  • S. W. Rissing & G. B. Pollock, "undated". "Exploring task allocation within ant cofoundress associations," ELSE working papers 021, ESRC Centre on Economics Learning and Social Evolution.
  • Handle: RePEc:els:esrcls:021
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:els:esrcls:021. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: s. malkani (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/elucluk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.