IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ehs/wpaper/5060.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Sources of welfare support in early modern Württemberg, c.1500-1700

Author

Listed:
  • Paul Warde

    (University of Cambridge)

Abstract

"This paper will examine the development and contexts of welfare provision in the Lutheran Duchy of Württemberg in south-western Germany over the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries. This is intended to be part of a larger session examining the form and implications of poor relief systems in early modern Europe, with special attention to the institutional background of particular welfare measures, and their scale and effect. The development of poor relief in the German countryside has received barely any attention, and no major study of any kind, despite extensive work on developments in some of the larger cities of central Europe. Hence researchers working on these issues in the wider European context have had access to only minimal comparative material, very little of which exists in the English language, allowing an assumption to persist that welfare provision was largely informal, kin based, or simply non-existent. This paper will present the results of a study designed in a small way to contribute to the redress of this imbalance. The core of the study is formed by research on the district of Leonberg, and area of around 10 000 inhabitants c.1600, based on consultation of the accounts of the poor relief administration, and related municipal and village accounts, petitions, court cases, and other government records. Formal, mandatory state poor chests developed from the middle of the sixteenth century, though with strong, parochially-based pre-Reformation antecedents. The paper will present a detailed examination of income and expenditure patterns for this relief system, which largely catered for extreme indigence and one-off costs for other households. Income came from a wide variety of sources, including effectively mandatory rating of the population, but with considerable local variation. It must, however, be viewed in the context of a strong tradition of regulation and local government by village and town communes. These institutions provided critical ‘disaster relief’ to secure food supplies in the event of dearth, especially tailored towards using communal finance to obtain large loans. Equally, evidence will be presented of the extensive use of communal and municipal granaries, which built stocks up as a buffer against famine in the late sixteenth and early seventeenth centuries. These granaries were by no means only a strategy employed in large urban centres. These institutions are also viewed in the further context of broad access to landholding, common rights, and the local, intra-peasant provision of credit. Overall, the development of the relief system demonstrates the institutional wherewithal to engage a number of different strategies for relief, within the context of an economy enjoying only a small amount of surplus income subject to redistribution, multiple sources of income for most households, and a strong directing hand on the part of communal powerbrokers."

Suggested Citation

  • Paul Warde, 2005. "Sources of welfare support in early modern Württemberg, c.1500-1700," Working Papers 5060, Economic History Society.
  • Handle: RePEc:ehs:wpaper:5060
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.ehs.org.uk/dotAsset/62ae1485-5dc4-4bbe-bb7c-b23be4b4963e.doc
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • N00 - Economic History - - General - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ehs:wpaper:5060. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chair Public Engagement Committe (currently David Higgins - Newcastle) (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ehsukea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.