IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ehs/wpaper/5051.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

City and Court: patterns of consumption in 16th century London

Author

Listed:
  • Ian Archer

    (University of Oxford)

Abstract

"This paper takes as its starting point the famous article by FJ Fisher on the development of London as a centre of conspicuous consumption. Its aims are twofold: first to flesh out Fisher’s argument with some more quantitative material on the importance of court demand. It uses royal household, aristocratic and gentry household accounts to look at patterns of consumption (what things were purchased in London and why?), and where possible attempts to relate the data to figures for overall consumption in the metropolitan area. This enables some informed speculation about the relative significance of London’s status as a court city and the role of overseas trade in its sixteenth century growth. Its second aim, in which it is probably more successful, is to assess the social and political significance of court demand by exploring the nature of the relationships between royal and aristocratic consumers and London tradesmen. Court demand meant that many Londoners developed close patronage ties with courtiers, enabling them in turn to mobilise those connections for both personal and local objectives. Many suppliers can be shown to be key brokers at a local level. In this way we are able to see something of the interpenetration of court and city. The paper’s focus on the sixteenth century also enables us to refine further the chronology of the development of luxury consumption, providing the prequel to work in progress by Linda Levy Peck."

Suggested Citation

  • Ian Archer, 2005. "City and Court: patterns of consumption in 16th century London," Working Papers 5051, Economic History Society.
  • Handle: RePEc:ehs:wpaper:5051
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.ehs.org.uk/dotAsset/1714cc62-2746-4602-bd3f-9b015f2845a3.doc
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • N00 - Economic History - - General - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ehs:wpaper:5051. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chair Public Engagement Committe (currently David Higgins - Newcastle) (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ehsukea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.