IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ehs/wpaper/5049.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Self-selection, location, and entrepreneurship: British self-employment in North America in the early 20th century

Author

Listed:
  • Chris Minns

    (Trinity College Dublin)

  • Marian Rizov

    (Trinity College Dublin)

Abstract

"The decision to undertake international migration has long interested economics and economic historians alike. Labour economists have placed considerable emphasis to the nature of self-selection among immigrants: under what conditions do individuals with high or low levels of skill choose to relocate across borders? Economic theory has been used to relate immigrant self-selection to relative economic conditions between source and destination regions, with the relative dispersion of earnings in the two areas thought to be a key determinant of immigrant selection (Borjas, 1987). This theoretical perspective can be extended to consider the choices made by immigrants from a single source country among a wider set of potential destination markets. While labour economists have examined immigrant selectivity in contemporary labour markets, the early twentieth century offers a better testing ground for this theory. As flows between Europe and North America were largely unregulated prior to 1917, we can observe how immigrants self-select across a set of labour markets in the absence of rigid immigrant policies and other constraints. Can differences in economic conditions lead destination countries to receive immigrants from the same source but with very different abilities in the labour market? Scholars of nineteenth century North America have asked this very question with reference to British immigration. Some observers of British immigration claimed that, due to the limited range of labour market opportunities in Canada, Britons choosing to reside in this country were considerably less able than those who chose to move to the United States. Recent work by Green, MacKinnon, and Minns (2002) finds that the economic characteristics of British immigrants in both countries were broadly similar circa 1900, but self-selection may lead to immigrant populations with important differences in unmeasured characteristics, such as schooling or innate ability. In this paper, we search for evidence of differences in immigrant self-selection across destination choices through an assessment of self-employment among British immigrants in Canada and the United States in the early twentieth century. We examine self-employment because it is one of the few indicators of labour market status available in both Canadian and American Census data from the early twentieth century, and one that is associated with high levels of human capital (Minns and Rizov, 2003). We use the United States Census of 1910 and the Census of Canada of 1901 to estimate the determinants of self-employment in both countries. Our results will provide important evidence on possible differences in immigrant self-selection between the two labour markets: in either the United States or Canada, were British immigrants better endowed with the characteristics associated with successful entrepreneurship, or more likely to become self-employed entrepreneurs, conditional on observable characteristics?"

Suggested Citation

  • Chris Minns & Marian Rizov, 2005. "Self-selection, location, and entrepreneurship: British self-employment in North America in the early 20th century," Working Papers 5049, Economic History Society.
  • Handle: RePEc:ehs:wpaper:5049
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.ehs.org.uk/dotAsset/c48df5ee-0321-41ca-b409-6822d2f7187e.doc
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • N00 - Economic History - - General - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ehs:wpaper:5049. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chair Public Engagement Committe (currently David Higgins - Newcastle) (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ehsukea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.