Empire, ecology and economy: cotton in 18th century Europe

"In the early eighteenth century cotton accounted for a very small proportion of Europe’s textile production. Linens and woollens dominated the manufacturing sectors of most Western countries and, in the case of Britain, they constituted at least three quarters of the island’s exports. A century later the picture had dramatically changed. Cotton was the most important textile in the West, characterised not only by enormous output, but also by a new industrial structure of production. This paper seeks to analyse the well-known story of the rise of the cotton industry in Europe through a closer analysis of the ‘ecologic’ potential and impact of such a fibre. Cotton was the only textile fibre not to be produced within Europe. Why, how and how much did Europe rely on such an ‘exotic’ raw material to further its process of economic transformation? This question implies a clearer understanding of how cotton changed the ‘textile mix’ of pre-industrial Europe. The paper argues that cotton fitted within a neo-mercantilist view of European overseas economic interests. Using Crosby’s notion of ‘ecological imperialism’, the paper shows the real and perceived limitations of a textile economy heavily reliant on endogenous fibres such as flax and wool. The unique growth rates of cotton textile production in Europe was not only the result of a dramatic change in the use of fibres. Manufacturing and commercial interests were important in securing new markets for cotton textiles. In the early eighteenth century the European woollen manufacturers successfully protected their markets and products through restrictive legislation on the import of Asian cotton textiles. Economic historians have considered the rise of the Lancashire fustian industry as the by-product of such legislation and as an attempt to substitute a previously imported commodity. This paper argues that the cotton industry grew instead out of a general re-definition of textile production in the second half of the century. Rather than emphasising endogenous factors such as import substitution strategies and the role of technological innovation, this paper examines how one part of the globe (Europe) came to acquire substantial advantages in the production of cotton textiles by underlining the nature of the raw material and the importance of overseas markets."