IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ehs/wpaper/17003.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Bengal silk industry and laisser-faire policies in the nineteenth century: Deindustrialisation revisited

Author

Listed:
  • Karolina Hutkova

    (London School of Economics)

Abstract

"In the late eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries Bengal was, with over 40% share on total imports, quantitatively the most important exporter of raw silk into Britain. The English East India Company (EEIC) played an important role in Bengal’s dominance. During the period of 1760s-1830s the Company developed a value chain in raw silk manufacturing and integrated cocoon procurement, reeling, warehousing, transport, advertising and the organisation of sale among its business activities. The EEIC relied on economies of scale which gave it an advantage. Moreover, thanks to learning-by-doing the Company also developed an expertise in silk manufacturing. This expertise built on the adoption of ‘best practices’, on acquiring new knowledge through sending silk experts to Bengal, and on granting patents for innovations of silk technologies. The Company offered its knowledge and services such as warehousing, transportation, marketing, sales and guidance about new technologies, innovations and best practices also to private entrepreneurs. When the 1833 EEIC Charter forced the Company to withdraw from raw silk manufacturing, the sector lost entrepreneurial guidance. In comparison to the EEIC, private entrepreneurs had little access to specialised knowledge and skills, and could not take advantage of economies of scale. In the post-1833 period innovative activities were not successful, no major innovation was adopted and the share of Bengal raw silk on the total imports of raw silk to Britain decreased to around 13%. "

Suggested Citation

  • Karolina Hutkova, 2017. "Bengal silk industry and laisser-faire policies in the nineteenth century: Deindustrialisation revisited," Working Papers 17003, Economic History Society.
  • Handle: RePEc:ehs:wpaper:17003
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.ehs.org.uk/destruction.docx
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • N00 - Economic History - - General - - - General

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ehs:wpaper:17003. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chair Public Engagement Committe (currently David Higgins - Newcastle) (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ehsukea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.