IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ehs/wpaper/15024.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Fifty years of revisions in the official estimates of GDP for the UK and their impact on the interpretation of postwar economic performance

Author

Listed:
  • Samuel Williamson

    (University of Illinois Chicago)

  • Enrico Berkes

    (Northwestern University)

Abstract

"The value of GDP for the UK has been reported in official reports since World War II.1 Over that time there have been changes in the observations for particular years because of a variety of reasons. The most obvious is that real GDP is regularly revised to reflect the most recent price level. Others include new data, new techniques such as chain-linking, and changes in the definition of what is GDP such as what happens when the UK converted to the European System of Accounts (ESA). Eight years ago, Bill Martin published an article in the Financial Times that was critical of the ONS numbers before 1987. He attributed the cause the 1998 conversion to the ESA(95) In another article he suggested that these numbers could be fixed, but recent events would seem to show his advise has not been followed. We do not propose in this paper to explain the changes in the various versions of annual GDP, the quality of them, or why one is preferred to another. This paper does three things. First, it reports on the compiling of all the official versions of GDP that have been published since 1959 that is now available online. The second part of the paper presents a discussion of what was the impact these numbers had when they were published and if subsequent revisions would have changed the conclusions made at the time. Finally we will discuss the large revisions of last two years and the implication for the current interpretation of post war growth."

Suggested Citation

  • Samuel Williamson & Enrico Berkes, 2015. "Fifty years of revisions in the official estimates of GDP for the UK and their impact on the interpretation of postwar economic performance," Working Papers 15024, Economic History Society.
  • Handle: RePEc:ehs:wpaper:15024
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.ehs.org.uk/dotAsset/2de2e3b9-e0a3-46b6-8471-c70bc53fce12.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • N00 - Economic History - - General - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ehs:wpaper:15024. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chair Public Engagement Committe (currently David Higgins - Newcastle) (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ehsukea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.