IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ehl/lserod/66035.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Comment on ‘what to do instead of significance testing? Calculating the “number of counterfactual cases needed to disturb a finding”’ by Stephen Gorard and Jonathan Gorard

Author

Listed:
  • Kuha, Jouni
  • Sturgis, Patrick

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Kuha, Jouni & Sturgis, Patrick, 2016. "Comment on ‘what to do instead of significance testing? Calculating the “number of counterfactual cases needed to disturb a finding”’ by Stephen Gorard and Jonathan Gorard," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 66035, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    • Handle: RePEc:ehl:lserod:66035
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/66035/
    File Function: Open access version.
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rosenbaum, Paul R., 2010. "Design Sensitivity and Efficiency in Observational Studies," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 105(490), pages 692-702.
    2. Imbens,Guido W. & Rubin,Donald B., 2015. "Causal Inference for Statistics, Social, and Biomedical Sciences," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521885881.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ian Gazeley & Rose Holmes & Andrew Newell & Kevin Reynolds & Hector Gutierrez Rufrancos, 2023. "Escaping from hunger before WW1: the nutritional transition and living standards in Western Europe and USA in the late nineteenth century," Cliometrica, Springer;Cliometric Society (Association Francaise de Cliométrie), vol. 17(3), pages 533-565, September.
    2. Guido W. Imbens, 2020. "Potential Outcome and Directed Acyclic Graph Approaches to Causality: Relevance for Empirical Practice in Economics," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 58(4), pages 1129-1179, December.
    3. Clare Leaver & Owen Ozier & Pieter Serneels & Andrew Zeitlin, 2021. "Recruitment, Effort, and Retention Effects of Performance Contracts for Civil Servants: Experimental Evidence from Rwandan Primary Schools," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 111(7), pages 2213-2246, July.
    4. Tenglong Li & Kenneth A. Frank & Mingming Chen, 2024. "A Conceptual Framework for Quantifying the Robustness of a Regression-Based Causal Inference in Observational Study," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-14, January.
    5. Tenglong Li & Jordan Lawson, 2021. "A generalized bootstrap procedure of the standard error and confidence interval estimation for inverse probability of treatment weighting," Papers 2109.00171, arXiv.org.
    6. Matias D. Cattaneo & Luke Keele & Rocio Titiunik, 2023. "A Guide to Regression Discontinuity Designs in Medical Applications," Papers 2302.07413, arXiv.org, revised May 2023.
    7. Luke Keele & Stephen O’Neill & Richard Grieve, 2021. "Comparing the Performance of Statistical Adjustment Methods by Recovering the Experimental Benchmark from the REFLUX Trial," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 41(3), pages 340-353, April.
    8. Andrius Kažukauskas & Thomas Broberg & Jūratė Jaraitė, 2021. "Social Comparisons in Real Time: A Field Experiment of Residential Electricity and Water Use," Scandinavian Journal of Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 123(2), pages 558-592, April.
    9. España, F. & Arriagada, R. & Melo, O. & Foster, W., 2022. "Forest plantation subsidies: Impact evaluation of the Chilean case," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    10. Bo, Hao & Galiani, Sebastian, 2021. "Assessing external validity," Research in Economics, Elsevier, vol. 75(3), pages 274-285.
    11. Brian G. Vegetabile & Daniel L. Gillen & Hal S. Stern, 2020. "Optimally balanced Gaussian process propensity scores for estimating treatment effects," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 183(1), pages 355-377, January.
    12. Fukui Hideki, 2023. "Evaluating Different Covariate Balancing Methods: A Monte Carlo Simulation," Statistics, Politics and Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 14(2), pages 205-326, June.
    13. Matias D. Cattaneo & Rocío Titiunik, 2022. "Regression Discontinuity Designs," Annual Review of Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 14(1), pages 821-851, August.
    14. Zabrocki, Léo & Leroutier, Marion & Bind, Marie-Abèle, 2021. "Estimating the Causal Effects of Cruise Traffic on Air Pollution using Randomization-Based Inference," OSF Preprints v7ctk, Center for Open Science.
    15. Tenglong Li & Ken Frank, 2022. "The probability of a robust inference for internal validity," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 51(4), pages 1947-1968, November.
    16. Pablo Geraldo Bast'ias, 2024. "Credible causal inference beyond toy models," Papers 2402.11659, arXiv.org.
    17. Zhexiao Lin & Peng Ding & Fang Han, 2021. "Estimation based on nearest neighbor matching: from density ratio to average treatment effect," Papers 2112.13506, arXiv.org.
    18. Richard Aviles-Lopez & Juan de Dios Luna del Castillo & Miguel Ángel Montero-Alonso, 2023. "Exploratory Matching Model Search Algorithm (EMMSA) for Causal Analysis: Application to the Cardboard Industry," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-34, October.
    19. Hirschauer, Norbert & Grüner, Sven & Mußhoff, Oliver & Becker, Claudia & Jantsch, Antje, 2020. "Can p-values be meaningfully interpreted without random sampling?," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 14, pages 71-91.
    20. Zhexiao Lin & Peng Ding & Fang Han, 2023. "Estimation Based on Nearest Neighbor Matching: From Density Ratio to Average Treatment Effect," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 91(6), pages 2187-2217, November.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • C1 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ehl:lserod:66035. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: LSERO Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/lsepsuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.