IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ehl/lserod/122550.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Qualitative, rather than quantitative, differences between HLA‐DQ alleles affect HLA‐DQ immunogenicity in organ transplantation

Author

Listed:
  • Maguire, Chelsea
  • Crivello, Pietro
  • Fleischhauer, Katharina
  • Isaacson, Dylan
  • Casillas, Aurora
  • Kramer, Cynthia S. M.
  • Copley, Hannah c.
  • Heidt, Sebastiaan
  • Kosmoliaptsis, Vasilis
  • Meneghini, Maria
  • Gmeiner, Michael
  • Schold, Jesse
  • Louzoun, Yoram
  • Tambur, Anat r.

Abstract

Prolonging the lifespan of transplanted organs is critical to combat the shortage of this life-saving resource. Chronic rejection, with irreversible demise of the allograft, is often caused by the development of donor-specific HLA antibodies. Currently, enumerating molecular (amino acid) mismatches between recipient and donor is promoted to identify patients at higher risk of developing HLA antibodies, for use in organ allocation, and immunosuppression-minimization strategies. We have counseled against the incorporation of such approaches into clinical use and hypothesized that not all molecular mismatches equally contribute to generation of donor-specific immune responses. Herein, we document statistical shortcomings in previous study design: for example, use of individuals who lack the ability to generate donor-specific-antibodies (HLA identical) as part of the negative cohort. We provide experimental evidence, using CRISPR-Cas9-edited cells, to rebut the claim that the HLAMatchmaker eplets represent “functional epitopes.” We further used unique sub-cohorts of patients, those receiving an allograft with two HLA-DQ mismatches yet developing antibodies only to one mismatch (2MM1DSA), to interrogate differential immunogenicity. Our results demonstrate that mismatches of DQα05-heterodimers exhibit the highest immunogenicity. Additionally, we demonstrate that the DQα chain critically contributes to the overall qualities of DQ molecules. Lastly, our data proposes that an augmented risk to develop donor-specific HLA-DQ antibodies is dependent on qualitative (evolutionary and functional) divergence between recipient and donor, rather than the mere number of molecular mismatches. Overall, we propose an immunological mechanistic rationale to explain differential HLA-DQ immunogenicity, with potential ramifications for other pathological processes such as autoimmunity and infections.

Suggested Citation

  • Maguire, Chelsea & Crivello, Pietro & Fleischhauer, Katharina & Isaacson, Dylan & Casillas, Aurora & Kramer, Cynthia S. M. & Copley, Hannah c. & Heidt, Sebastiaan & Kosmoliaptsis, Vasilis & Meneghini,, 2024. "Qualitative, rather than quantitative, differences between HLA‐DQ alleles affect HLA‐DQ immunogenicity in organ transplantation," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 122550, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
  • Handle: RePEc:ehl:lserod:122550
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/122550/
    File Function: Open access version.
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    epitope; histocompatability; immunogenicity; organ transplantation; HLA-DQ; histocompatibility;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • J1 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demographic Economics

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ehl:lserod:122550. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: LSERO Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/lsepsuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.