IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ehl/lserod/112779.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Costs and cost-effectiveness of Malaria control interventions: a systematic literature review

Author

Listed:
  • Conteh, Lesong
  • Shuford, Kathryn
  • Agboraw, Efundem
  • Kont, Mara
  • Kolaczinski, Jan
  • Patouillard, Edith

Abstract

Objectives: To systematically review the literature on the unit cost and cost-effectiveness of malaria control. Methods: Ten databases and gray literature sources were searched to identify evidence relevant to the period 2005 to 2018. Studies with primary financial or economic cost data from malaria endemic countries that took a provider, provider and household, or societal perspective were included. Results: We identified 103 costing studies. The majority of studies focused on individual rather than combined interventions, notably insecticide-treated bed nets and treatment, and commonly took a provider perspective. A third of all studies took place in 3 countries. The median provider economic cost of protecting 1 person per year ranged from $1.18 to $5.70 with vector control and from $0.53 to $5.97 with chemoprevention. The median provider economic cost per case diagnosed with rapid diagnostic tests was $6.06 and per case treated $9.31 or $89.93 depending on clinical severity. Other interventions did not share enough similarities to be summarized. Cost drivers were rarely reported. Cost-effectiveness of malaria control was reiterated, but care in methodological and reporting standards is required to enhance data transferability. Conclusions: Important information that can support resource allocation was reviewed. Given the variability in methods and reporting, global efforts to follow existing standards are required for the evidence to be most useful outside their study context, supplemented by guidance on options for transferring existing data across settings.

Suggested Citation

  • Conteh, Lesong & Shuford, Kathryn & Agboraw, Efundem & Kont, Mara & Kolaczinski, Jan & Patouillard, Edith, 2021. "Costs and cost-effectiveness of Malaria control interventions: a systematic literature review," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 112779, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
  • Handle: RePEc:ehl:lserod:112779
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/112779/
    File Function: Open access version.
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kristian Schultz Hansen & Siân E Clarke & Sham Lal & Pascal Magnussen & Anthony K Mbonye, 2017. "Cost-effectiveness analysis of introducing malaria diagnostic testing in drug shops: A cluster-randomised trial in Uganda," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(12), pages 1-18, December.
    2. Natasha Howard & Lorna Guinness & Mark Rowland & Naeem Durrani & Kristian S Hansen, 2017. "Cost-effectiveness of adding indoor residual spraying to case management in Afghan refugee settlements in Northwest Pakistan during a prolonged malaria epidemic," PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(10), pages 1-18, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lucy C. Okell & Titus K. Kwambai & Aggrey Dhabangi & Carole Khairallah & Thandile Nkosi-Gondwe & Peter Winskill & Robert Opoka & Andria Mousa & Melf-Jakob Kühl & Tim C. D. Lucas & Joseph D. Challenger, 2023. "Projected health impact of post-discharge malaria chemoprevention among children with severe malarial anaemia in Africa," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-10, December.
    2. Elisa Sicuri & Francesco Ramponi & Iris Lopes-Rafegas & Francisco Saúte, 2022. "A broader perspective on the economics of malaria prevention and the potential impact of SARS-CoV-2," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-3, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Keywords

      cost-effectiveness; disease control interventions; malaria; unit cost;
      All these keywords.

      JEL classification:

      • E6 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - Macroeconomic Policy, Macroeconomic Aspects of Public Finance, and General Outlook

      NEP fields

      This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ehl:lserod:112779. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: LSERO Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/lsepsuk.html .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.