IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/eep/report/rr2016064.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Guidelines for Conducting Extended Cost-benefit Analysis of Dam Projects in Thailand

Author

Listed:
  • Piyaluk Chutubtim

    (Chiang Mai University)

Abstract

Dam construction has long provided valuable economic benefits to Thailand in distributing low-priced electricity and supporting low-income farmers by providing them with free-flowing irrigation water; this promotes domestic consumption and investment. Even though many benefits are expected from dam construction, a dam project needs to be carefully evaluated using costbenefit analysis (CBA) before approval. Decision-makers have to review the negative effects of the construction and operation of a dam. These effects are sometimes difficult to measure in monetary terms. Each impact requires the use of particular techniques to determine their monetary value; the choice depends on the characteristics of a particular impact and what relevant information is available. The primary data technique incorporates the market price approach, revealed preferences approach, and stated preferences approach. The secondary data technique is also called the benefits transfer method. An erroneously-conducted CBA can lead policy-makers to make a wrong decision on a project. Therefore, in order to provide policy-makers with accurate information and right recommendations on a project alternative, an analyst has to identify all potential project impacts, apply appropriate valuation methods and select the correct criteria. This report provides basic guidelines for analysts to conduct a proper CBA on dam projects and includes a case study of the Kwae Nai Dam in Thailand that will give useful insight into the practical applications of a CBA.

Suggested Citation

  • Piyaluk Chutubtim, 2016. "Guidelines for Conducting Extended Cost-benefit Analysis of Dam Projects in Thailand," EEPSEA Research Report rr2016064, Economy and Environment Program for Southeast Asia (EEPSEA), revised Apr 2016.
  • Handle: RePEc:eep:report:rr2016064
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.eepsea.org/pub/rr/2001_RR16.pdf
    File Function: First version, 2001
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Guidelines; Cost-benefit Analysis; Dam; Thailand;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eep:report:rr2016064. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Arief Anshory yusuf (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eepsesg.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.