In many instances where public policy concerning externalities is considered, ensuring an adequate perception of the public is not less important than setting ideal taxes. We show however that public authorities are typically incited to deliver biased information (exaggeration or attenuation) to economize on the coercive instruments. Technically, we solve of model of signal cum cheap-talk. Anti-smoking campaigns and policy against antibiotics over-consumption serve as illustrations of our points.
Download Info
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.