IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ecm/nawm04/129.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Effect of Cross Ownership on Competition in Auction Markets

Author

Listed:
  • Keith Waehrer
  • Patrick Greenlee

Abstract

We consider a model where bidders in an auction own passive partial claims over their rivals’ auction profits. While the cross ownership confers no ability to directly affect bidding behavior, the claims on rival profits dampen bidding competition. It is not uncommon for enforcement agencies to investigate such an arrangements as a possible violation of antitrust laws. When bidders hold the same aggregate level of shares in rival bidders in a first-price independent private-value auction, we find that such cross ownership has an effect similar to reducing the number of bidders while holding constant the distribution of the highest value in the auction. A similar decrease in competition occurs in independent private-value second-price auctions with two bidders and in first-price complete information auctions. In each of these cases, the competitive effect disappears as the level of cross ownership goes to zero. English auctions in complete information environments, however, generate strikingly different outcomes. There, for any positive level of cross ownership, the unique subgame perfect equilibrium generates the same result as the perfectly collusive outcome: the highest valued bidder wins the object at the lowest possible price

Suggested Citation

  • Keith Waehrer & Patrick Greenlee, 2004. "The Effect of Cross Ownership on Competition in Auction Markets," Econometric Society 2004 North American Winter Meetings 129, Econometric Society.
  • Handle: RePEc:ecm:nawm04:129
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    auction; competition;

    JEL classification:

    • L41 - Industrial Organization - - Antitrust Issues and Policies - - - Monopolization; Horizontal Anticompetitive Practices
    • D44 - Microeconomics - - Market Structure, Pricing, and Design - - - Auctions

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ecm:nawm04:129. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F. Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/essssea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.