In case of a merger or an acquisition, a tort liability that arises from the seller's conduct is often imposed on the buyer through the doctrine of successor liability. If the buyer has as much information about the potential liability as the seller, the first best is achieved: all gains from acquisition are realized and the seller takes the efficient amount of precaution. However, when the seller has more information about the potential liability than the buyer, there could be too little acquisition, too little incentive on the seller, or both. The court can increase the successor liability to improve welfare. We show that imposing a higher damages against the surviving seller is better than increasing the liability against the buyer
Download Info
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
file. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
References listed on IDEAS Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.: