Advanced Search
MyIDEAS: Login to save this paper or follow this series

The gap between macro and micro economic statistics: Estimation of the misreporting model using micro-data sets derived from the Consumer Expenditure Survey

Contents:

Author Info

  • Thesia I. Garner
  • Atsushi Maki

Abstract

In many countries we observe a gap between macroeconomic and microeconomic statistics. In order to explain the underreporting observed in microeconomic statistics, the present paper tests the misreporting hypothesis through the double hurdle model. The misreporting hypothesis is based on some key assumptions: It is assumed that there are two categories of 'zero expenditure households' in the Survey - one category involves households that did not purchase consumer durables during the survey period and reported zero expenditure correctly on the Survey while the other category of 'zero expenditure households' involves households that, although they purchased consumer durables during the survey period, reported zero expenditure on the Survey. This is the source of misreporting. We also assume that there are 'positive expenditure households' for consumer durables in the Survey. These positive expenditure households for consumer durables are assumed, in the misreporting hypothesis, to have reported correctly their expenditure on consumer durables in the Survey. This model enables us to correct for over-reporting of zero expenditure households in the micro data. The data used for estimation involves thirteen clusters of consumer durables from the Consumer Expenditure Survey complied by the Bureau of Labor Statistics. The empirical results are satisfactory in supporting the conclusion that misreporting plays an important role in the underreporting in microeconomic statistics compiled by the Bureau of Labor Statistics compared with macroeconomic statistics compiled by the Bureau of Economic Analysis, the US Department of Commerce

Download Info

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
File URL: http://repec.org/esAUSM04/up.17601.1075102278.pdf
Download Restriction: no

Bibliographic Info

Paper provided by Econometric Society in its series Econometric Society 2004 Australasian Meetings with number 33.

as in new window
Length:
Date of creation: 11 Aug 2004
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:ecm:ausm04:33

Contact details of provider:
Phone: 1 212 998 3820
Fax: 1 212 995 4487
Email:
Web page: http://www.econometricsociety.org/pastmeetings.asp
More information through EDIRC

Related research

Keywords: misreporting hypothesis; double hurdle model; underreporting;

Find related papers by JEL classification:

This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

References

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

Citations

Blog mentions

As found by EconAcademics.org, the blog aggregator for Economics research:
  1. The rich are different than you and me: They spend more.
    by Ezra Klein in Ezra Klein's Wonkblog on 2012-04-26 10:17:25
Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
as in new window

Cited by:
  1. Orazio Attanasio & Erik Hurst & Luigi Pistaferri, 2012. "The Evolution of Income, Consumption, and Leisure Inequality in The US, 1980-2010," NBER Working Papers 17982, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.

Lists

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ecm:ausm04:33. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Christopher F. Baum).

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.