IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ecm/ausm04/248.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Annuitization and Asset Allocation with HARA Utlity

Author

Listed:
  • Geoffrey Kingston
  • Susan Thorp

Abstract

A new explanation for the well-known reluctance of retirees to buy life annuities is due to Milevsky and Young (2002, 2003). Specifically, the decision to buy longevity insurance is largely irreversible, so that the real option to delay annuitization generally has value. Milevsky and Young analyticaly identify and numerically estimate the RODA in a setting of constant relative risk aversion (CRRA). This paper extends the analysis of Milevsky and Young to the case of hyperbolic absolute risk aversion (HARA),the simplest representation of a consumption habit.The formula for the optimal timing of annuitization ias surprisingly simple, but yields only a myopic solution, that is, the precise date of annuitization cannot be ascertained in advance. The effect of increasing the subsistence consumption rate on the timing of annuity purchase is similar to the effect of increasing the curvature function of the utility function. As in the CRRA case studied by Milevsky and Young, delayed annuitization is associated with optimistic forward-looking estimates of the Sharpe ratio.

Suggested Citation

  • Geoffrey Kingston & Susan Thorp, 2004. "Annuitization and Asset Allocation with HARA Utlity," Econometric Society 2004 Australasian Meetings 248, Econometric Society.
  • Handle: RePEc:ecm:ausm04:248
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Other versions of this item:

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Optimal stopping; annuitization; asset allocation; longevity risk;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G11 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Portfolio Choice; Investment Decisions

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ecm:ausm04:248. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F. Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/essssea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.